Martin v. Hood
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The first amended complaint in this action (which we will hereafter refer to as the complaint) purported to set forth two causes of action against the two defendants, each of which was separately stated and set out in a different or separate count. The defendants appeared separately and each filed both a general and special demurrer to each cause of action set forth in said first amended complaint. The court sustained both demurrers with leave for plaintiff to amend. Plaintiff chose to stand upon his pleading, and no amendment thereto having been filed, the court rendered judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McArthur v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Sorensen v. CoddingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Martin v. FeigenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Milton v. HareOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Modica v. CristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Feldesman v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Commercial Standard Title Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.