Legal Opinion

Martin v. Feigenberg

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12020PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action brought to recover possession of certain personal property of the alleged value of $1,250, and for $10,000 damages for the unlawful detention thereof. Plaintiff claimed to have been in possession of said personal property by virtue of a lease from C. H. Coddington, the owner thereof, and that defendants, on the fifteenth day of June, 1925, without plaintiff’s consent and wrongfully, entered upon the premises on which said personal property was situated and removed the same therefrom. The defendant Bercovich asserted title to said personal property through an execution sale thereof in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sorensen v. CoddingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riedman v. BarkwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Martin v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API