Legal Opinion
Jordan v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1968No. Civ. 32178PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NUTTER, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal by defendant county and certain of its officials from a judgment decreeing that a Los Angeles County ordinance regulating figure model “studios” is void and enjoining the County of Los Angeles and certain public officials from enforcing the ordinance against the operators of such studios. The ordinance has been amended and reenacted both before and after the trial court’s judgment. Bespondents did not file a brief or appear at oral argument. The case was a sequel to the ruling of this court and division in Spitcauer v. County of Los Angeles, 227…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 904California Supreme Court · 1946
- Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Equi v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- O'NEAL v. SeaburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- California Pacific Title & Trust Co. v. California Mining & Dredging SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Alternatives for California Women, Inc. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Los Angeles v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- United Farm Workers of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.