In re Estate of Blythe
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, distributing certain property of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts 'are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of Alice Edith Blythe, prosecuted from, the order and decree of the court in probate distributing certain property of the estate of Thomas H. Blythe to Florence Blythe Hinckley.
The petition for distribution of Florence Blythe Hinckley was filed on the eighteenth day of June, 1894. Alice Edith Blythe appeared and opposed the petition by demurrer and answer, and then appealed from the decree which was rendered October 26, 1894. Notice of appeal was given upon November 3, 1894. The bill of exceptions was settled upon January 15, 1895, and upon February 25,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- First Natl. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hollenbach v. SchnabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hinckley v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ricketson v. TorresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. SumnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Paulos v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Madruga v. Borden Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.