Legal Opinion

Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1901PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

■Opinion of tbe court by

Bukfoed, C. J.:

Tbe defendant in error, tbe McCormick Harvesting Machine company, brought its action ■against tbe plaintiff in error, A. A. Payne, to recover tbe possession of a quantity of wheat stored in a bin on which the Machine company claimed to have a chattel mortgage. Payne answered by a general denial. The canse was tried to a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the company, that it was entitled to the possession of the wheat, and that the value of its interest was $136.18. Payne appealed, and the cause is here for review.

The first error complained of is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grand Forks National Bank v. Minneapolis & Northern Elevator Co.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  2. Yandle v. CraneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Deford v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Bailey v. BayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Kennett v. FickelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Pearson v. Yoder Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. First Nat. Bank of Wetumka v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API