Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Yoder Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 6, 1913No. 2819PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from County Court, Tillman County; T. E. Campbell, Judge. Action by W. C. Yoder and Bell Yoder against D. B. Pearson. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON,' C.

This was an action by W. C. Yoder and wife to recover damages from D. B. Pearson on account of the wrongful recordation of a certain real estate mortgage. It is alleged in the petition that plaintiffs were the owners, of a certain described tract of land in Tillman county; that in the year 1909 they contracted with the defendant, Pearson, to make a loan of $1,800 on said place, said money to be secured for plaintiffs by Pearson through the company which he represented; that before the consummation of said contract they discovered that they were not obtaining the money…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Kuhl v. Supreme Lodge Select Knights & LadiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. State v. KiddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  5. Ward v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API