Legal Opinion

Deford v. Hutchison

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Franklin District Court. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

StraNG, C.:

Action for replevin. Plaintiff held a chattel mortgage upon a stock of millinery goods, store furniture and fixtures in possession of the defendant. By the terms of the mortgage the goods were to remain in possession of the defendant until condition broken, or the plaintiff deemed himself insecure. The plaintiff, deeming himself insecure, demanded possession of the goods, which was refused. He then commenced his action of replevin in the district court of Franklin county, Kansas, April 23, 1887. Defendant first answered by a general denial, and afterward filed an *319amended…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lamden v. SharpTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. Woodruff v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Pattison v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Thompson v. . KesselNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Zimmerman v. Sunset Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Wyman v. HerardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Miller v. ThayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API