Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Wetumka v. Nolen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1916No. 7564PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from County Court, Hughes County; J. Ross Bailey. Judge. Action by J. M. Nolen against the First National Bank of AVetumka. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed and remanded.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEAVK, C.

The parties will be designated as in the trial court. This action was instituted in the. county court of Hughes county to recover the sum of $157.76 which plaintiff claimed was due him from said defendant bank, being his balance on deposit in said bank. It appears from the evidence that on the lltli day of September, 1913, the plaintiff procured a loan from said bank in the sum of $600. The plaintiff was given a credit on the books of the bank for $400, and the controversy arose over the balance, $200. The defendant bank claimed that, at the time of the aforesaid…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marbourg v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Boyd v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  5. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sellars v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Folsom Morris Coal Mining Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Pittsburg County Ry. Co. v. HastySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API