University of Pittsburgh v. Townsend
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant University of Pittsburgh (“University”) brought suit against Defendants-Appellees David W. Townsend, Ronald Nutt, CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc. (“CTI”), and CTI PET Systems, Inc. (“CPS”) (collectively, “Defendants”), claiming that Defendants misappropriated the University’s rights and interests in a type of medical-scanning technology that the University alleges was collaboratively invented at its campus over a period of several years. The University’s complaint, as amended, asserts that Defendants, either individually or collectively, breached…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- St. John's University, New York v. BoltonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- York Cnty. v. Propertyinfo Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Boynton v. HEADWATERS, INC.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- York County v. PropertyInfo Corporation, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.