Legal Opinion

Cochran v. GAF Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1995PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTEMURO, Justice.

Appellant, Shirley Cochran, appeals from an order and memorandum opinion of the Superior Court affirming an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment based upon the statute of limitations.

The issue presented in this case 1 is whether the trial court properly held that Appellant’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations and not -within the “discovery rule” exception because of a failure to exercise due diligence in pursuing the cause of decedent’s illness.

*214The decedent, William Cochran, worked at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. Kach v. Hose ex rel. St. Moritz Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API