Legal Opinion
Boynton v. HEADWATERS, INC.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided August 6, 2010No. 1:02-cv-01111PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART HEADWATERS’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO ALL UNNAMED MEMBERS OF THE PLAINTIFF CLASS
JON P. McCALLA, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Headwaters, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to All Unnamed Members of the Plaintiff Class (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 790), filed April 14, 2010. The Class responded in opposition on May 20, 2010 (D.E. 811), and Headwaters filed a reply on June 1, 2010 (D.E. 821). For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Background
The facts underlying this matter are set out in detail…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Douglas Emmons v. Robert McLaughlin Donald Ratliff, Gary Dewalt, City of Norwalk, Reese WinemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Joshua Browning v. Gavin Downey, et al.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2026
- Meharry Medical College v. National Labor Relations Board, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Siqueiros v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021