Legal Opinion
St. John's University, New York v. Bolton
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 10, 2010No. 08-CV-5039 (NGG)(JMA)PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge.
St. John’s University (“Plaintiff’ or “St. John’s” or “the University”) brings this action alleging that Sanford Bolton (“Bolton”) and Spiridon Spireas (“Spireas”) deliberately concealed, for nearly thirteen years, the fact that research they had conducted at the University had yielded patentable inventions to which the University was legally entitled. Bolton, Spireas, and Hygrosol Pharmaceutical Corp. (“Hygrosol”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss the claims raised in the Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited136 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Ying Li v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- DeSilva v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Bertuglia v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.