Legal Opinion

County of Hennepin v. Holt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1973No. 43762PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Tem-Trol, Inc., lessee under a -written lease of premises owned one-half by Richard and Mardelle Holt and one-half by Violet Holt, appeals from a declaratory judgment limiting its rights to an apportionment of a condemnation award made by commissioners in proceedings instituted by Hennepin County to take the entire leased premises for public use. Tem-Trol’s principal challenge to the judgment is that neither the Holts’ nor Henne-pin County’s appeal from the commissioners’ condemnation award gave the district court jurisdiction over that part of the award apportioned to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Platt v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. RadosevichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. J. R. Skillern, Inc. v. leVisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. City of Rochester v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Helgeson v. GisselbeckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API