County of Hennepin v. Holt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Tem-Trol, Inc., lessee under a -written lease of premises owned one-half by Richard and Mardelle Holt and one-half by Violet Holt, appeals from a declaratory judgment limiting its rights to an apportionment of a condemnation award made by commissioners in proceedings instituted by Hennepin County to take the entire leased premises for public use. Tem-Trol’s principal challenge to the judgment is that neither the Holts’ nor Henne-pin County’s appeal from the commissioners’ condemnation award gave the district court jurisdiction over that part of the award apportioned to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Platt v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. RadosevichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- J. R. Skillern, Inc. v. leVisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- City of Rochester v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Helgeson v. GisselbeckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. AdelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.