Legal Opinion
State, by Lord v. Frisby
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 21, 1961No. 38,050PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying appellants’ motion for a new trial in condemnation proceedings for state highway purposes. Two issues are involved. Appellants urge (1) that the damages awarded by the jury are so inadequate as to require a new trial, and (2) that they were prejudiced by failure of the commissioners to comply with the provisions of Minn. St. 117.08 requiring separate awards for the value of the land taken and for damages to other property involved.
From the record it appears that the appellants are the owners of two lots in a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Bielke v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Jack Endo Electric, Inc. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. Hayden Miller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. HopfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.