Legal Opinion
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1968No. 40781PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
On May 8, 1961, the village of Minnetonka, as a part of a comprehensive municipal plan, enacted a zoning ordinance which prohibited billboards and signs erected for advertising purposes within areas zoned exclusively for residential use. A provision of the ordinance required that all nonconforming billboards be removed within 3 years after its effective date.
On February 6, 1964, plaintiff, Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company of Minnesota, Inc., received a letter from the chief building inspector of the village notifying it that 14 of its billboards were nonconforming and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.