Legal Opinion
In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1929No. 27,439PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
In condemnation proceedings for the widening of Third street by the city of St. Paul a lot and the building thereon were taken. Prior thereto and on January 14, 1927, appellant obtained from the fee owner a lease until July 31, 1937, to a part of the. building. It was awarded damages for its leasehold interest in the sum of $152.20. It appealed to the district court. The award was confirmed. From the order denying a new trial this appeal is taken.
The facts are admitted. The lease contained this provision:
“If the premises or any part thereof, or any part of the improvements of which they form…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Kafka v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Weeks v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Shipley v. Pittsburg, Carnegie & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by23 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Seabloom v. KrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Korengold v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.