Legal Opinion
William M. Young Co. v. Tri-Mar Associates, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided June 22, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STIFTEL, President Judge.
Judgment was rendered against Angelo Pantuliano and Mario Malone in the amount of $4,000 plus costs as a result of a mechanic’s lien action to which Pantuliano and Malone were third-party defendants. On November 3, 1975, the holders of that judgment, Joseph L. and Virginia T. Sar-ro, requested the issuance of an execution writ against a 1973 Pontiac Le Mans, Serial Number 2D35M3G-100397, owned by Angelo Pantuliano “and/or” Sara A. Pan-tuliano, the petitioners.
The issue here involves the significance of the “and/or” language in the title to the subject automobile. Is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wasilko v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- duPont v. duPontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Hoyle v. HoyleCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- Keystone Insurance v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Saylor v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Internal Revenue Service v. Donald Gaster and Mary Ann Gaster v. Ninth Ward Savings Bank, Fsb , Third-Party Mary Ann Gaster , in Nos. 94-7195 and 94-7196. Nos. 94-7195, 94-7196Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Krutz v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Don Scioli v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Fischer v. FischerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
- Internal Revenue Service v. GasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.