Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Fischer

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 12, 2005No. Civil Action No. 2242-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHANDLER, Chancellor.

When a married couple own property by the entireties and then one spouse initiates a divorce that will require the equal division of all jointly owned property, it is inequitable for the spouse who initiated the divorce to assert a claim to all of the property by operation of law when that spouse was under a contractual obligation to divide the property equally. In this case, a resulting trust for the benefit of the estate of Mr. Fischer will be placed upon all property that Mr. and Mrs. Fischer held by the entireties.

Both plaintiffs and defendant have filed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  3. Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. Monroe Park v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Don Scioli v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. In re the Matter of the Estate of Betty Kay KalistyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API