Krutz v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 25,1985, a Pontiac Fiero collided with a 1983 Chevrolet Camaro driven by Sharon Krutz (“Krutz”). Krutz allegedly suffered injuries in the accident that require compensation greater than the $25,-000 insurance proceeds available from the combined limits of the insurance policies held by the driver and owner of the Pontiac Fiero. Krutz, with her parents Earl and Marion Krutz as co-plaintiffs, filed this lawsuit to recover Krutz’s losses in excess of the available $25,000 from two of their insurers by way of the Delaware statutes…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lomax v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Essick v. BarksdaleDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Collins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2003