Legal Opinion
Wasilko v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 16, 1967No. Appeals, 121 and 122PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaulding, J.,
This is an appeal from a judgment against Home Mutual Casualty Company as insurer under a “non-owner” operator’s motor vehicle liability policy.
On June 29, 1963, Anthony Murawski and Constance Wasilko, while riding in an automobile owned by Bernard Murawski, were involved in a collision with a car driven by Harry L. Jukes. The three plaintiffs obtained judgments against Jukes and writs of execution were returned unsatisfied. Plaintiffs instituted suit against Home Mutual, alleging the company was liable for the judgments against Jukes. A jury trial resulted in verdicts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. American Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Hertz Corp. v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Antone v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Donovan v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Herbert VedermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Bensalem Township v. Western World InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- American Franklin Life Insurance v. GalatiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Pfeiffer v. Grocers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.