Legal Opinion
Hoyle v. Hoyle
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided May 12, 1949PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Vice Chancellor:
Essentially this is a suit for an accounting between husband and wife.
Plaintiff Eugene Hoyle filed a complaint for an accounting against his wife, Edith Hoyle, who in turn filed a counterclaim. Plaintiff and defendant were married in Scranton, Pennsylvania, on May 1, 1944, and came to Wilmington, Delaware, some time in June or July of the same year. For a few months the plaintiff engaged as a partner in a garage business. In the latter part of September, 1944, both the plaintiff and the defendant commenced working as trolley coach operators. They continued this work up…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Geist v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Ciconte v. BarbaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
3Cited by14 opinions
- duPont v. duPontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Internal Revenue Service v. Donald Gaster and Mary Ann Gaster v. Ninth Ward Savings Bank, Fsb , Third-Party Mary Ann Gaster , in Nos. 94-7195 and 94-7196. Nos. 94-7195, 94-7196Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Morrison v. PotterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Moser v. MoserSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Widder v. LeedsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.