Legal Opinion

Holland Furnace Co. v. Korth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1953No. 32526PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

Holland Furnace Company brought this action against Una J. Korth to recover the unpaid contract price for converting defendant’s heating plant from gas to oil. The trial court sustained an affirmative defense based on rescission for fraud, and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals.

The essential facts, as found by the trial court, may be summarized as follows: Miss Korth was obtaining unsatisfactory service from an old cast-iron coal and wood furnace which had been converted for the use of gas, with gravity circulation of warm air. On November 12, 1951, she contacted plaintiff company…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Holcomb & Hoke Manufacturing Co. v. Auto Interurban Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Darnell v. NoelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gronlund v. AnderssonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Jacquot v. Farmers Straw Gas Producer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hays Merchandise, Inc. v. DeweyWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. McInnis & Co. v. Western Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Swanson v. SolomonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. McCamon v. Darnall RealtyWyoming Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API