Legal Opinion

Holcomb & Hoke Manufacturing Co. v. Auto Interurban Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1926No. 19815. Department OnePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— On November 19, 1923, Holcomb & Hoke Manufacturing Company sold to the respondent, Auto Interurban Company, a Butter-Kist Popcorn Machine, on a conditional sales contract. The contract price of the machine was $895. Of this sum, $150 was paid in cash, and the balance was agreed to be paid in bi-weekly installments of $29.50 each, and a final installment of $5.50. The contract provided that a promissory note should be given for the deferred payments, and such an instrument was given, although, perhaps, not in form a negotiable instrument. Both the con tract and the note provided that a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Hotel Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Producers Grocery Co. v. Blackwell Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wells v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bank IV Salina, N.A. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  4. Hawthorn-Mellody, Inc. v. DriessenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Green Bay Auto Distributors, Inc. v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API