Legal Opinion
Laurent v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1950No. Civ. 14282PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
Appellant filed in the superior court his petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondents as members of the Public Utilities Commission and J. H. Turner as manager of public utilities and B. M. Doolin as manager and chief engineer of the airport department “to formally accept the bid of petitioner and to execute a lease with petitioner, ...” covering a certain area at the San Francisco Airport near South San Francisco. Respondents’ return raised issues of law and fact. The court’s ruling denying the writ amounted to the sustaining of a demurrer to the petition.
The petition alleges that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Stanley-Taylor Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Neal Publishing Co. v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Braun, Bryant & Austin v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- City of San Buenaventura v. Ventura County Star, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Old Town Dev. Corp. v. Urban Renewal Agency of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- The Gamewell Company, a Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Charles L. Harney, Inc. v. DurkeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.