Legal Opinion

Stanley-Taylor Co. v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1902No. S.F. No. 2647PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appeal from judgment, entered for defendants, after order sustaining demurrer to petition for a-writ of mandate. The petition shows that the defendants, as the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco, advertised for sealed proposals for furnishing the said city and county with certain printed forms and blanks, and that the contract would be let to the lowest bidder. The advertisement stated that the “board reserves the right to reject any and all bids if the public good so require.” The petitioner put in a bid in due form, which was the lowest of several bids…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Old Town Dev. Corp. v. Urban Renewal Agency of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Transdyn/Cresci JV v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API