Legal Opinion

Neal Publishing Co. v. Rolph

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1915No. S.F. No. 6985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Percy V. Long, City Attorney, J. F. English, Assistant City Attorney, and Geo. B. Benham, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

Hearing granted in the supreme court after decision by the district court of appeal, first district.

This is an appeal from a judgment directing that a writ of mandate issue on the application of the petitioner, commanding the appellant, as mayor of the city and county of San Francisco, to sign and execute a certain contract with the petitioner for the furnishing of certain supplies in the way of printed blanks and forms, for use in the several departments of the city government, which contract had been awarded to the petitioner as the successful bidder for such supplies.

There is no dispute as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanley-Taylor Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. United States v. OllingerDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Laurent v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Diablo Beacon Printing & Publishing Co. v. City of ConcordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API