Legal Opinion

Buxbom v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1944No. L. A. 18380PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an action for damages sustained in conjunction with a breach of two contracts of employment. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury, findings were made in favor of the plaintiff, and from the judgment based thereon the defendants now appeal.

The complaint sets forth two oral contracts contemporaneously made on February 12, 1939, and the purported cancellation of both of them as the preliminary basis for relief. One was a contract by which the defendants employed the plaintiff for a period of six months to handle the publication of a newspaper—a “shopping news”—to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Delz v. Winfree, Norman & PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Harris v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API