Legal Opinion
Stoddard v. Treadwell
California Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1864PublishedCited by 39 opinions
Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
The complaint in this action contains three counts, the first two of which are based upon the following written contract annexed to and made part of the complaint:
*301“ Memorandum of agreement and sale made this 14th day of January, 1861, between Wm. M. Stoddard and Treadwell & Co. The said Stoddard has sold and hereby sells and transfers to Treadwell & Co. all the stock of goods and fixtures in the store hitherto kept by him, said Stoddard, on J street, Sacramento, an inventory of which has been made out by said Stoddard, and is now present, and also the good will of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- McKyring v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Pattison v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Bracket v. M'NairNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Cook v. MoseleyNew York Supreme Court · 1835
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.