Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Standard-Knapp, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 5, 1996No. 13838PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The workers’ compensation commissioner for the eighth district granted the plaintiffs motion to preclude defenses in this workers’ compensation case because the defendants1 did not file a disclaimer of liability in a timely manner. The compensation review board upheld the decision of the commissioner, and the defendants thereafter appealed to this court. To reach the merits of the issue on the appeal, which is whether the plaintiffs notice of claim satisfied General Statutes § 31-294c (a) and (b),2 we must first determine if the appeal is taken from a final judgment.3 Stroiney v. Crescent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Matey v. Estate of DemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Guinan v. Direct Marketing Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Donahue v. Veridiem, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Hunt v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Matey v. Estate of DemberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Mase v. Riverview Realty Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API