Legal Opinion
Donahue v. Veridiem, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 19, 2009No. SC 18237PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
In Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc., 286 Conn. 102, 128-29, 942 A.2d 396 (2008), this court concluded that an employer deemed “conclusively presumed to have accepted the compensability of the alleged injury” under General Statutes § 31-294c (b), 1 because of its failure either to contest liability or to commence payment of compensation within the prescribed time period under the statute, is precluded from contesting both the compensability and the extent of disability arising from the alleged injury. The appeal in the present case raises the issue of whether an employer subject…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Ducharme v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Jorden R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Jones v. TOWN OF REDDINGSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Costantino v. SkolnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Wiblyi v. McDonald's Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Woodbury-Correa v. Reflexite Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.