Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Borough of Naugatuck

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 22, 2005No. SC 17205PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

The defendant, the borough of Naugatuck, appeals from the order of the Appellate Court dismissing its appeal from a decision rendered by the compensation review board (board) in favor of the plaintiff, Ronald Hunt. The defendant claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal on the ground that the board’s decision did not constitute a final judgment. We agree with the defendant and, accordingly, reverse the order of the Appellate Court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Imbrogno v. Stamford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Pearce v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Levarge v. GEN. DYNAMICS CORP., ELEC. BOATSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API