C. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
This action was instituted to foreclose a materialman’s lien and to recover on a statutory bond given by the contractors. The appeal is taken on the judgment-roll alone. It appears from the findings that the defendants Longshore, as owners, entered into a contract with the defendants Thompson and Stowell, as contractors, for the erection of a building on the owners’ lot in the city of Redondo Beach. Defendant McWhinnie, as surety, purported to execute a bond to insure the performance of the contract as provided for in section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The building was completed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kurtz v. ForquerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bird v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Simons Brick Co. v. HetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- P. A. Buell & Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Robison v. MitchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McDonough v. Chu Chew ShongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Doherty v. CarruthersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Gross v. HazeltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Newt Olson Lumber Co. v. CueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951