Kurtz v. Forquer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action upon a bond alleged to have been executed by the defendants Forquer and Deyo as principals, and the defendants Allen, Smith, and Stewart as sureties, conditioned for the faithful performance by Forquer and Deyo, of a certain contract, by which they agreed to build and deliver to plaintiff, free of indebtedness, liens, etc., a certain house. Judgment went for plaintiff against Allen, Smith, and Stewart, and they appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.
1. The bond purports to be the bond of all the defendants, but it was in fact signed only by Allen,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- City & County of Sacramento v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Dyer v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Melander v. Western National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bacon v. GrosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.