Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Chu Chew Shong
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1937No. Civ. 10263PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
—Action upon an indemnity contract to guarantee plaintiffs from loss by reason of their furnishing bail. The facts show that on November" 27, 1934, one Lee Young was arrested and imprisoned under an indictment charging him with violating the act of the Congress of the United States known as the Jones-Miller Act, relating to the importing and concealment of morphine, also section 37 of the Criminal Code of the United States relating to a conspiracy to commit any offense against the United States, and section 174, title 21 of the Code of Laws of the United States, bail being fixed in the sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CurryNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- C. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- County of Los Angeles v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- County of Los Angeles v. RickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Starkovich v. NoyeArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- American Star Insurance v. GirdleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- American Star Ins. Co. v. GirdleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.