Legal Opinion
Gross v. Hazeltine
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1930No. Docket No. 239PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.
In this action, plaintiff sought to1 establish a certain amount as due to him for materials furnished and labor done in improving a certain eighty acres of land belonging to defendants Hazeltine, and sought to establish and foreclose a lien on the land for the amount claimed. The action is based upon a contract reading as follows:
“Agreement and Lease.
“This agreement and option made and entered into in duplicate at El Centro, Imperial County, California, this 16th day of October 1919 by and between C. E. Hazeltine hereinafter called owner and D. Gross hereinafter called tenant.
“Witnesseth:—Owne…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Dougherty-Moss Lumber Co. v. ChurchillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- In Re the Guardianship of the Persons & Estates of MorehouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Golden State v. Eastern Municipal Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2014