Legal Opinion
Doherty v. Carruthers
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1959No. Civ. 18260PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Defendants contracted with Jack Bried, the original contractor, for certain repairs and improvements on their real property. The contract contained the following provision: “Notice of completion to be filed by this contractor [Bried].” Bried entered into subcontracts with plaintiffs Randolph Doherty and Burt C. Wheeler for materials and with plaintiff Ernest Ongaro for materials and labor.
The work of improvement was completed August 9, 1955. On October 17, a notice of completion, reciting that the work of improvement was completed on October 14, was filed by Bried. It was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dastagir v. DastagirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Hughes Manufacturing & Lumber Co. v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Schwarz & Gottlieb, Inc. v. MarcuseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Hubbard v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Worthen v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DEPARTMENT OF INDUS. REL. v. Fidelity Roof Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kray Cabling Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Fidelity Sound Systems. Inc. v. American Bonding Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978
- Fontana Paving, Inc. v. Hedley Brothers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. CarawayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.