Legal Opinion

Newt Olson Lumber Co. v. Cue

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1951No. Civ. No. 7869; Civ. No. 7870Published

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

The present controversy arose out of an action instituted by plaintiff Olson Lumber Company against the defendants Cue and Mr. and Mrs. Whitehurst to foreclose a materialmen’s lien, and a second action filed by plaintiff Gardner against the same defendants to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The Whitehursts answered and cross-complained against The Fidelity and Casualty Company on its bond. Upon stipulation the two eases were consolidated for trial and following a judgment favorable to plaintiffs, the bonding company and the Whitehursts separately appeal to this court.

The record shows that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nevada County Lumber Co. v. JanissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. C. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API