Legal Opinion

Kiser v. . Kiser

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

This is a controversy between husband and wife. The parties were married in Rural Hall, N. C., 14 October, 1916, and lived together until 27 January, 1930. A child, Frances Elizabeth Kiser, was born of the union on 17 December, 1918, and is now living.

The jury found all the issues in favor of the plaintiff, which are unnecessary to set forth. It was contended by defendant that Judge Harding in his judgment found as a fact that the defendant was making $60 a month and made an allowance to plaintiff of $70 a month. It is contended by plaintiff that he further found “that for about ten years…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McManus v. . McManusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. West v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Byerly v. . ByerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Davidson v. . DavidsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Howell v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Anderson v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API