West v. . West
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.
Tbe question involved: Should tbe order adjudging defendant in contempt of court bave been signed over tbe objection of defendant from tbe record as appears in tbe ease ? We think not.
Chapter 17, Consolidated Statutes, under “Contempt,” tbe pertinent provision to tbe present controversy, is C. S., 978: “Any person guilty of any of tbe following acts may be punished for contempt: (4) Wilful disobedience of any process or order lawfully issued by any court.” It will be noted that to punish for contempt in a matter of this kind, there must be wilful disobedience. We think tbe decision binges on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Brittain v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. . ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Lamm v. . LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- In Re HegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.