Legal Opinion

West v. . West

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.

Tbe question involved: Should tbe order adjudging defendant in contempt of court bave been signed over tbe objection of defendant from tbe record as appears in tbe ease ? We think not.

Chapter 17, Consolidated Statutes, under “Contempt,” tbe pertinent provision to tbe present controversy, is C. S., 978: “Any person guilty of any of tbe following acts may be punished for contempt: (4) Wilful disobedience of any process or order lawfully issued by any court.” It will be noted that to punish for contempt in a matter of this kind, there must be wilful disobedience. We think tbe decision binges on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Brittain v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. . ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Lamm v. . LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. In Re HegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API