Legal Opinion

Howell v. . Howell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.

The question involved: Does the decree of absolute divorce in C. S. Howell’s action in Chatham County upon the ground of two years separation impair or destroy Mrs. Howell’s right to receive alimony under a judgment and decree in Mrs. Howell’s action in Wake County rendered before the commencement of the proceeding for absolute divorce on the grounds of separation, the divorce decree reciting that it does not? We think not.

N. 0. Code, 1931 (Michie), sec. 1663, is as follows: “After a judgment of divorce from the bonds of matrimony, all rights arising out of the marriage shall cease and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lentz v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Walker v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Kiser v. . KiserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Rayfield v. RayfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API