Legal Opinion

Byerly v. . Byerly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

C. S., 1667, in part, is as follows: “If any husband • shall separate himself from his wife and fail to provide her and the children of the marriage with the necessary subsistence according to his means and condition in life, . . . and it shall be lawful for such judge to cause the husband to secure so much of his estate or to pay so much of his earnings, or both, as may be proper,” etc. This section was amended by Public Laws 1921, ch. 123, as follows: “That section one thousand six hundred and sixty-seven (1667) of Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina be amended by inserting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McManus v. . McManusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Price v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Deal v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API