Legal Opinion
State v. Goetz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 9, 1971No. 1036PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Defendant appeals following a jury trial on the charge of possession of marihuana, OES 474.020, that resulted in conviction. The only assignment of error that merits discussion is defendant’s claim that the state must prove possession of a usable amount of marihuana, and that it failed to do so.
We have found no Oregon cases on point, although the issue has been mentioned. See, State v. Burgess, 5 Or App 164, 483 P2d 101 (1971); State v. O’Brien, 6 Or App 34, 485 P2d 434, 486 P2d 592 (1971), aff'd 94 Adv Sh 1281, — Or —, 496 P2d 191 (1972). Cases from other jurisdictions are collected in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bernard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.