Legal Opinion

State v. O'BRIEN

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Defendant was convicted by the court sitting without a jury of illegal possession of narcotics. ORS 474.020. He contends that (1) the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony and in denying a motion to strike the testimony; (2) the court erred in allowing testimony of another crime; and (3) the court erred in not allowing his motion for judgment of acquittal.

There was evidence establishing that one evening Russel Edmonds went to the New World Coffee House in Eugene where he encountered the defendant, Arthur Koivisto and Judy Freeman. After a few minutes a fifth person, Joe Lyda, joined them…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. ZimmerleeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. SieckmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API