State v. Forrester
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207(1). Both the state and defendant stipulated that defendant possessed 5 milligrams of heroin, and that such an amount was sufficient to allow the identification of the drug, but insufficient to result in any discernible effect upon introduction into the body of a user. The sole question on appeal is whether ORS 167.207(1) applies to possession of a quantity of a narcotic drug which is "identifiable” but not "useable” in that it is not a quantity sufficient to produce a discernible effect.
ORS 167.207(1) provides:
"A…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Pelham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Judd v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. VanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.