Legal Opinion

State v. Burgess

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Upon trial to the court sitting without a jury defendant was convicted of illegal sale of heroin in violation of ORS 474.020. On appeal he makes two assignments of error, (1) the failure of the state to prove that the quantity of heroin involved was of such quantity and quality as to be susceptible of use as a narcotic drug, and (2) the viewing of a Federal Bureau of Investigation record of previous convictions of the defendant by the trial judge prior to the finding of guilt.

In support of his first assignment of error defendant cites cases from other jurisdictions holding that in order to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. PaolaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Hurt v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. State v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API