State v. Dennis
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
The first assignment of error relates to the denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. There was no eyewitness to the killing and the State’s case, therefore, stands upon circumstantial evidence. The rules concerning the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence are well established in this jurisdiction, and the innumerable citations from other states were unnecessary. Those rules may be stated as follows: The direct evidence of eyewitnesses is not necessary for conviction. The fact that a crime has been committed (the corpus delicti), and that it was done by the defendant, may b.e…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- The People v. . HoveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Commonwealth v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- State v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.