Legal Opinion

Rayburn v. Comstock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1890No. Case No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Simpson, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiffs entered into a contract with defendants, November 13, 1885, in which they agreed to go upon certain lands of defendants, and cut, haul, and deliver at the west branch of Hubbard lake, upon what is known as the " Lockwood Landing,” all the timber suitable for saw-logs, for the sum of $3 per 1,000 feet. From two to three millions of said timber was to be deliv*450ered each year, until all was delivered. The timber was to be cut clean, and in a prudent manner, and all to be ■cut that was suitable for lumber or shingles. Said logs were to be well landed and on skids, and well rolled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bottomly v. BottomlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herron v. RauppMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lagerloef Trading Co. v. American Paper Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  3. Lee v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Federal Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BursteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Fowles v. RupertMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API