Herron v. Raupp
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iosco; Connine, J. Assumpsit by William Herron against Gustav A. Raupp, Matthias Raupp, Jr., and John Seavitt, copartners as G. A. Raupp & Co., for breach of a logging contract. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Blair, 0. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the profits which he alleged he would have received if defendants, a copartnership, had not prevented his performance of an alleged contract with said firm to peel certain hemlock bark and log certain timber of defendants. *163The declaration alleges that the parties entered into a verbal contract on the 16th of May, 1906, whereby the defendants agreed that—
“In order to manufacture such timber they would place or cause to be placed on said lands forthwith portable sawmills to be located at suitable mill sites on said lands as follows, to wit:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Allis v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- McKinnon v. McEwanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Smalley v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Industrial Works v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caplis v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Wise v. YunkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Robinson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Southwell v. Parker Plow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Detroit Fireproofing Tile Co. v. Vinton Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916