Legal Opinion

Federal Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Burstein

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The defendants owned certain real estate in the city of Detroit and were desirous of erecting thereon an apartment building. They had .some money but not sufficient to finance the project. They applied to plaintiff to secure for them a mortgage loan of $125,000. The matter was talked over, an agreement reached and a written contract made, one section being as follows:

“The party of the second part agrees that it will counsel and advise with and give the borrower the benefit of its wide experience concerning the matters in connection with the proposed construction in general, and said party of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leonard v. BeaudryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Greenwood v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Scheible v. KleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Rayburn v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. CowheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Miller v. AshtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. United States Gypsum Co. v. ZacksMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API