Legal Opinion

Lagerloef Trading Co. v. American Paper Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 2, 1923No. 3183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Among the conditions of the contracts the fifth provided that each ship*954ment was to be considered a separate contract and that default on one or more shipments should not invalidate the rest of the contract. Seller, intending to plead in conformity to the Indiana Code, filed a complaint in two paragraphs. Each paragraph stated the facts with respect to one of the two contracts. Each contract covered three shipments or installments. Buyer makes the point that separate consideration of the several installments required six paragraphs of complaint. Buyer…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Utex Exploration Company v. Archie Garwood, R. C. Gerlach and W. E. BozmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  3. Stefanowicz Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Lamborn v. BlattnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
  5. Snyder v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API